Ruby gem bulk updating jin akanishi dating
Can bitnami be somehow upgraded to rails 2.1.0 (without needing to wait for the next redmine bitnami stack)? (as “gem rails update”) or is it possible to download and overwrite some files? We’ve open sourced this into a gem since writing this post. Of course, the inevitable price for this abstraction is some performance overhead. Hiding horribly verbose SQL queries behind concise, readable ruby; magically knowing that the foreign key for ; the list goes on.Usually it’s not a bottleneck, but when you need to do something just slightly more complicated than usual, it can be.We simply want to send our user's selection of records along to a new page. around our search results, but we may not always want this.For example, what if we need multiple forms to be able to send our selection to different controllers in our application?One instance of this we’ve run into at Handshake is the need to insert many rows into a join table. Definitely the most extreme in terms of sheer number of records we need to create, is related to our user notification preferences.There are three tables involved in those - per user, which is a lot if our “certain set of users” is, say, all students and alumni (about 1.4 million as of writing this). We support users in the career services office sending mass emails to groups of students at their school, up to and including the entire student body.
Not only has it kept up with Rails development, but it works with several databases. mysql2_makara, mysql2spatial, postgis, postgresql_makara, seamless_database_pool, spatialite – then those all work too.
i have actionmailer (2.1.0)actionpack (2.1.0)activerecord (2.1.0)activeresource (2.1.0)activesupport (2.2.2, 2.1.0)fastthread (1.0.1)passenger (2.0.3)rack (0.4.0)rails (2.1.0)rake (0.8.3, 0.8.1)tzinfo (0.3.9)Hum after a reboot, i have an error with passenger : Error message: uninitialized constant Action View:: Template Finder Exception class: Name Error And i have :actionmailer (2.2.2, 2.1.2, 2.1.0)actionpack (2.2.2, 2.1.2, 2.1.0)activerecord (2.2.2, 2.1.2, 2.1.0)activeresource (2.2.2, 2.1.2, 2.1.0)activesupport (2.2.2, 2.1.2, 2.1.0)fastthread (1.0.1)mysql (2.7)passenger (2.0.6, 2.0.5, 2.0.3)rack (0.4.0)rails (2.2.2, 2.1.2, 2.1.0)rake (0.8.3, 0.8.1)tzinfo (0.3.12, 0.3.9) How to tell to redmine to use the good version ?
Hello Fellow Nexposers I updated to the latest Gem (as we were having some issues with nexpose/ ruby saying there were duplicate vulns being submitted (but then I checked and cross checked and rechecked Nexpose and my CSV and couldnt find any) SOOO I updated to Gem 0.8.1 Here is the creation/ approval part of my script: CSV.foreach('ICMPTEST-vuln_exceptions_specific.csv', ) do |exception| begin vulns = nsc.list_device_vulns(exception['device_id']) rescue puts "Asset does not exist: Failed to add exception for Asset Address: # Vuln ID: '#'." next end vuln = vulns.select .first unless vuln puts "Asset Vulnerability does not exist: Failed to add exception for Asset Address: # Vuln ID: '#'." next end vuln_exception = Vuln Exception.new(vuln.id, Vuln Exception:: Scope:: SPECIFIC_INSTANCE_OF_SPECIFIC_ASSET, exception['reason']) vuln_exception.asset_id = exception['device_id'] vuln_= exception['port'] vuln_exception.vuln_key = exception['vuln_key'] vuln_exception.submitter = exception['submitter'] vuln_exception.expiration = exception['expiration'] vuln_exception.save(nsc, exception['SComment']) vuln_exception.approve(nsc, exception['RComment'])end And here's what i'm using for a CSV: device_id,vuln_id,port,vuln_key,reason, Scomment, Submitter, Rcomment, Expiration1753,generic-icmp-timestamp,,, Acceptable Risk, TEST FOR SCRIPT - SCOMMENT, Dkoob, TEST FOR SCRIPT - RCOMMENT,2054,generic-icmp-timestamp,,, Acceptable Risk, TEST FOR SCRIPT - SCOMMENT, DKoob, TEST FOR SCRIPT - RCOMMENT,2016-01-01 When I run the script i get the following error: C:/Program Files/Ruby200-x64/lib/ruby/gems/2.0.0/gems/nexpose-0.8.1/lib/nexpose/vuln_excep tion.rb:315:in `validate': Port or vuln_key is required.
(Argument Error) from C:/Program Files/Ruby200-x64/lib/ruby/gems/2.0.0/gems/nexpose-0.8.1/lib/nexpose/vuln_excep tion.rb:143:in `save' from C:/Remediation/TEST-Nexpose Bulk Exclude-Specific Instance Asset.rb:52:in `block in ' from C:/Program Files/Ruby200-x64/lib/ruby/2.0.0/csv.rb:1717:in `each' from C:/Program Files/Ruby200-x64/lib/ruby/2.0.0/csv.rb:1120:in `block in foreach' from C:/Program Files/Ruby200-x64/lib/ruby/2.0.0/csv.rb:1266:in `open' from C:/Program Files/Ruby200-x64/lib/ruby/2.0.0/csv.rb:1119:in `foreach' from C:/Remediation/TEST-Nexpose Bulk Exclude-Specific Instance Asset.rb:34:in `' The vuln does not create or get approved or anything.
If I take out the vuln_line and just have the approve line: vuln_exception.approve(nsc, comment = nil) I get the following: C:/Program Files/Ruby200-x64/lib/ruby/gems/2.0.0/gems/nexpose-0.8.1/lib/nexpose/api_reques t.rb:128:in `execute': Nexpose API: Action failed: cvc-complex-type.4: Attribute 'exception-id' must appear on element 'Vulnerability Exception Approve Request'.